Replay waste
Retries, agent loops, and CI prompt suites re-buy the same model call.
Where identical or mechanical repeats still hit the lab, and what it costs.
Audit
A written architecture report of your agent workflow, at a fixed price.
We read what you actually run — hosts, models, tools, fetch, keys, meters. You get a report ranked by engineering risk. Not a sales deck. Not a certification. Not an implementation.
What you receive
- Swift ($100.00) — a short written note from a skim of the submission. Main risks only. Little or no diagram.
- Ample ($200.00) — a structured report plus at least one architecture diagram of your described workflow.
- Elaborate ($400.00) — full report: diagrams, ranked findings, recommended changes, explicit out-of-scope. Includes a follow-up round of questions.
Delivered as a written artifact (Markdown, PDF, or both — you choose). First human response in 1–7 business days is acknowledgement / start of work, not “report attached.” Report delivery then follows the SKU.
The service
A typical workflow we read
What we look for
Prefill growth
Every turn resends the whole transcript. Cache breakpoints missing or misplaced.
How context growth is billed today, and where a breakpoint would land.
No session record
Calls happen. Nothing signed or independently checkable survives.
What an auditor could prove after the fact from the workflow you run.
Key sprawl
Provider keys in agents, CI, and laptops. No single crossing to meter.
Where secrets live and which hop could become the one meter.
Unmetered tool / API calls
Mid-session third-party calls with no ledger.
Which tool hops are invisible to cost and to review.
Uncontrolled fetch
Public web or RAG ingest without robots, SSRF, or PII gates.
What the ingest path actually does, and which gates are missing.
Multi-provider drift
OpenAI vs Anthropic vs local, no common meter or identity.
How identities and bills split across labs in this stack.
No spend control
No hard or soft cap, no cost-center split, surprise bills.
Where a cap could sit without pretending to govern the agent.
Timeline
- Day 0 — pay, then submit the brief and any attachments.
- Days 1–7 — first human response (start of work).
- Then the report — Swift from the submission only; Ample after reading attachments; Elaborate after a follow-up round. No same-week guarantee for Elaborate.
Fixed prices
Swift
$100.00One-time. USD. Not a seat, not meters.
- Skim of the submission only.
- Short written note: main risks, little or no diagram.
Ample
$200.00One-time. USD. Not a seat, not meters.
- Proper read of the attachments.
- Structured report plus at least one architecture diagram of your described workflow.
Elaborate
$400.00One-time. USD. Not a seat, not meters.
- Attachments plus a follow-up round of questions.
- Full architecture report: diagrams, ranked findings, recommended changes, explicit out-of-scope.
Honesty
This is not Intermediate. It does not mint a pipe key and does not attach meters. It is not a SOC2 or legal opinion, and it is not implementation work. The report is confidential to the buyer. If a receipted crossing would help the architecture, that can appear as an engineering observation — not as a sales close.